Where to begin? How about with a few random thoughts?
My time was 11:57 and I finished 33rd overall out of 118 finishers. I'm pissed.
I saw the winner, Nick Clark, who broke Kyle Skaggs' 2008 course record (about a month later, Kyle became the first person ever to break 24 hours at the Hardrock 100), descending Caballo Mountain (pronounced Ca-buy-yo) and was astonished by how fast he was running.
Seeing Nick and others in action, I realized yet again that I suck at downhill technical trail running. I've known this for about a year now and yet I haven't done anything about it. No more. I haven't always been this bad. I used to be a decent trail runner back when I had trails near my house in Ohio. I even won a 100-mile trail race once, but that was a lifetime ago. I'm rusty on technical trails now, and just plain bad on mountain trails, and it showed on Saturday in a big, big way.
For a while now I've been quietly rationalizing that, while I was pretty good ultrarunner out East, running out in the Mountain West isn't my cup of tea and so I should resign myself to being slightly better than mediocre. No more. While I would never delude myself into believing I can be the next Nick Clark, I do think I can improve as a runner and maybe place top 10 in races like Jemez and even Leadville. I just want my results to align with my desire.
Jemez is without question the hardest 50 miles I've ever run, and just about any Jemez finisher will tell you the same thing (including Nick Clark himself). One guy told me it's Hardrock cut in half. Unless you live and run out in the Mountain West or have done lots of races out here, you couldn't possibly imagine the difficulty of Jemez and its wicked-steep, very technical and scree-laced ascents and descents which take you above 10,000 feet. The race packs 25,000 feet of combined elevation change and is widely considered one of the three hardest 50s in the nation (along with the San Juan Solstice and Zane Grey 50s). Some people say Heartbreak Hill at Boston is hard. Compared to Jemez, Heartbreak Hill is merely a parking lot speed bump or maybe a small pile of dirt you could kick out of your way. We're talking about monster mountains here, about b-line ascents up along double black diamond ski slopes that in many areas are at a 45 degree grade. We're talking about navigating bomber drops that go on for miles, including a 300-vertical-foot drop with scree that is easily 70 degrees. Yes, I said 70 degrees. This is about what 70 degrees looks like: /.
I'm not going to do a blow-by-blow race report. The first 21 miles were great. I did the climbs and descents just fine and loved the very runnable stretch just before the grassy Caldera section. Caldera, with huge clumps of grass in a big-ass field surrounded by big-ass mountains that await you, wasn't that bad, either. It was the back-country, off-trail climb after Caldera that things started getting crazy. I navigated downed trees and an absolutely huge boulder field before climbing up a monster ascent (Cerro Grande) that in many areas was 45 degrees and went on for a few miles. When finally to the top, I gently (read: slowly) coasted down and regrouped.
The section that really finished me off was Pajarito Mountain, home of the double black diamond ski slope I referred to earlier in this post. You're talking about ~5 miles and ~3,000 feet of mostly b-line ascent (versus switchbacks). But that wasn't even the hardest part. Once at the top, you had to get back down by running straight down the damned slope to the ski lodge. My quads were screaming in agony. I felt like a broken man. Actually, I felt like a guy who for the past 6 months has been running roads in comfortable Parker.
After Pajarito, I had a tough stretch, but eventually regrouped for about 4 miles. But at about mile 45, the wheels came off and I started walking a bunch and was plenty pissed off. When I came into the last aid station at about mile 48.1, I was told I was 1.9 miles from the finish and I looked at my watch and realized I had 32 minutes to work with in going sub-12 hours--my Plan B goal (Plan A goal was south of 11 hours and the dream scenario was in the neighborhood of 10-10.5 hours). So I pulled it together and got 'er done. The winning time was 8:07 set by Superman himself, Nick Clark. Yeah, this isn't the JFK 50-Mile Race, where the winning time is around 5:50. This is a hardcore, back-country 50-mile mountain race that will make you see God and scream for your momma if you're not ready for it.
***
I do want to say that Jemez is a very well-organized race with friendly, supportive and helpful volunteers who are generous with their time. The post-race festivities were awesome and included a cook-out, beer and many other delicious treats. This was a first-class race put on by people who know what they're doing. Also, the city of Los Alamos is beautiful with its surrounding mountains and huge mesas. I loved New Mexico--what an outdoor paradise it is--and thought the drive from Denver to Los Alamos was spectacular, albeit very remote in certain stretches.
Also, after the race I talked for a little while with Nick Clark, who I congratulated on his win. He was one of the many who pointed out that my lack of mountain running is hindering my results. Nick is a great guy and he took a genuine interest in my race and where I thought things may have gone wrong. He'd actually heard of me, probably from this blog. But what a first-class individual he is and a true credit to this sport.
***
Jemez was an awakening for me. Why?
As a few runners who I greatly respect have told me in the last 2 days, it's clear I'm not running in the mountains enough. If I want results, I need to train as much as I can in the mountains. I knew this before the race but did little to rectify the problem because, in my mind, I was too busy to venture beyond the cushy confines of Parker. No more. For the next 3 months, I'll be making it a point to get to the mountains at least 1-2 times a week. This will be difficult as far as scheduling and family, but I have to get my trail legs back and I need to run some serious vertical and steep drops to develop my mountain skills. I've identified several mountains with at least 1,000 feet of vertical (the ideal amount I'll be after is 1,500 to 2,000 feet of vertical, and preferably more) that I can venture to without spending half a day away from home. I'll find time for big outings to Leadville, Pikes Peak, etc.
My failure at Jemez had nothing to do with toughness. I'm tough. It had nothing to do with mileage. I put in the miles. And it had nothing to do with speed or even lungs. It had everything to do with inexperience on technical mountain trails. As my trusted advisers have told me, the only way to get results in hard mountain races is to train in the mountains. You can't be a road warrior like I've been and expect to do anything decent at Jemez.
So there's my mandate.
Showing posts with label Jemez Mountain 50-Mile. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jemez Mountain 50-Mile. Show all posts
Monday, May 23, 2011
Thursday, January 13, 2011
Jemez Mountain 50-Mile
Early this week I got the burning desire to formalize my 2011 racing schedule so I can actually start focusing on what's next. Plus, we now have a much better idea of Anne's weekend on-call schedule, allowing me to get the racing schedule in order. But, most important of all, I'm seeing good improvement in my foot and so it's time to think 2011!
Except for this week, I've been really satisfied with how my training is starting to ramp us. This week has been off-the-charts busy and we have a sick little boy, which means training has been hard to do. I'm now at about 2/3 running and 1/3 cycling and am planning my first outside run this weekend--my first outside run in a long time. It'll likely be a short run on some very tame trails in my neighborhood.
So as I've thought and thought about my spring races, two events have surfaced. The first is the Eisenhower Marathon on April 9 in Abilene, Kansas, home of Ike himself. That's only three months away. I'd love to PR in the marathon and have decided that in early March I'll make a decision about Eisenhower. By then my mileage will need to be around 70-80/week with very solid speedwork and tempo runs--a lot to ask for when I've been majorly injured for six months now. So Eisenhower is tentative and probably slightly doubtful.
I've also registered for the Jemez Mountain 50-Mile Race outside of Los Alamos, New Mexico. A lot of people say Jemez (pronounded HE-Mez) is the toughest 50-mile race in the U.S. Here's how the organizers describe the course:
The training plan for Jemez is to get up to 70-80 miles per week with lots of hills and mountain running, along with quality at the track. I'll be going to Boulder when I can to take on Green Mountain and those beautiful snowy trails. The key is to do all of this gradually, not over-stressing my foot. My orthotic will hopefully provide all the support I need.
Who wouldn't want to be a part of this race?
Except for this week, I've been really satisfied with how my training is starting to ramp us. This week has been off-the-charts busy and we have a sick little boy, which means training has been hard to do. I'm now at about 2/3 running and 1/3 cycling and am planning my first outside run this weekend--my first outside run in a long time. It'll likely be a short run on some very tame trails in my neighborhood.
So as I've thought and thought about my spring races, two events have surfaced. The first is the Eisenhower Marathon on April 9 in Abilene, Kansas, home of Ike himself. That's only three months away. I'd love to PR in the marathon and have decided that in early March I'll make a decision about Eisenhower. By then my mileage will need to be around 70-80/week with very solid speedwork and tempo runs--a lot to ask for when I've been majorly injured for six months now. So Eisenhower is tentative and probably slightly doubtful.
I've also registered for the Jemez Mountain 50-Mile Race outside of Los Alamos, New Mexico. A lot of people say Jemez (pronounded HE-Mez) is the toughest 50-mile race in the U.S. Here's how the organizers describe the course:
The JMTR races take place in the scenic Jemez mountains in Northern New Mexico. The course is on technical trails with a substantial amount of elevation change. The 50k and 50 mile events include extremely steep climbs and descents on very technical terrain. On the course, runners will experience high altitude (over 10,000 feet above sea level), scree fields, stream crossings, fallen trees, and other obstacles. The course has numerous aid stations but there are some long stretches (greater than 5 miles) between aid stations. Please review the course description page for more details. Runners are encouraged to strongly consider their comfort level on this type of terrain before registering.In his race report, Nick Clark, the winner of last year's Jemez 50-Mile, said "Jemez is easily the toughest 50-mile race I have ever run, and the rate of attrition among runners was, not surprisingly, quite high." I read Lucho's horrifying report not long after the 2010 Jemez race and then, upon reading his report again after registering, couldn't help but swallow hard. Lucho finished sixth at the 2010 Leadville 100. Yeah, Jemez is a monster! I'm going to have to be in good shape, but I really want to peak not for Jemez but rather for the Leadville 100. I really believe you can truly peak only twice--and maybe three times--each year. Just give me a solid showing at Jemez and I'll be happy. Also, I think Jemez will provide a nice idea of how difficult the Hard Rock 100 will be when that day comes for me.
The training plan for Jemez is to get up to 70-80 miles per week with lots of hills and mountain running, along with quality at the track. I'll be going to Boulder when I can to take on Green Mountain and those beautiful snowy trails. The key is to do all of this gradually, not over-stressing my foot. My orthotic will hopefully provide all the support I need.
Who wouldn't want to be a part of this race?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)